Brian Barry

Unpublished Works

book-1659717_640

Over the course of his career, Brian Barry wrote, but did not publish, a number of complete or nearly-complete books. These are listed below together with an introduction and downloadable pdf files.

fountain-pen-447576_1920

Brian wrote numerous papers both for publication that were not published and for giving at seminars and workshops. In addition, some material was possibly intended for future books. These are listed below. We will be adding to this list and trying to identify the date when they might have been written, the reason, and so on.

books-1245690_1920

Among other things left behind and unpublished are seminar papers, talks, even job talks. We will be adding to this list and trying to identify the date when they might have been written, the reason, and so on.

mail-2696657_1920
Image by Marisa Sias from Pixabay

Correspondence needs to be added.

school-1223873_1920

Teaching materials need to be added.

owl-4819550_1920

Links need to be added.

Book Titles

Brian…
Brian revised this typescript. We will comment soon on the revisions (and the various sources that prompted them). For the moment, you can download a copy of TO BE ADDED: Wasted Votes and Other Mares’ Nests REVISED
This version of Rich Countries and Poor Countries dates from 1980 and was intended for Cambridge University Press. It is incomplete in various ways (in particular, Chapters 5 & 6 are missing and Chapters 4 & 7 incomplete).
 
As Katrina Forrester writes in her Introduction (kindly prepared for this site), “Brian Barry was one of the first Anglo-American philosophers to consider international and intergenerational justice in the terms we discuss them today. This incomplete draft manuscript Rich Countries and Poor Countries (1980) contains unpublished material on these topics, as well as versions of arguments that Barry published in a series of essays in the late 1970s and early 1980s (including ‘Circumstances of Justice and Future Generations’ (1978), ‘Justice as Reciprocity’ (1979), his Tanner Lectures on Human Values Do Countries Have Moral Obligations? The Case of World Poverty (1980) and ‘Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective’ (1982)).”
 
Download Katrina’s Introduction
Towards the end of his life, Brian was working on a short book on game theory. Like many of Brian’s books, the initial plan was for something very short but it slowly expanded into something bigger. The Introduction explains the motivations behind the book. Brian writes, ‘I would not have written this book if I did not believe that [game theory] can contribute to the resolution of some problems that cannot even be clearly stated without it. I shall discuss in what follows some uses (and some abuses) of game theory in political theory. My own suspicion is, however, that there is much more room still left for the application of game theory to political theory, and that the main reason for its limited use is that few political theorists have even an elementary grasp of game theory.  This book is not a substitute for a systematic study of game theory.  It  provides an elementary exposition of basic ideas in  game theory and develops these ideas only in directions that bear on issues central to political theory.  
Other books that expound game theory and its applications to politics tend to combine sophisticated game theory with rather crude political theory.  In this book, by  way of contrast, it is the game theory that is rudimentary. There is no algebra and no symbolic logic. Moreover, the examples that are worked through take the simplest form possible. The apparatus used consists only of payoff matrixes and decision trees, both of which are explained with a degree of redundancy that may make some readers impatient.  My objective is, however, to break down the resistance of even those most subject to mathematics phobia – provided they actually want to find out about game theory, of course. And my experience has been that there is no substitute for going very slowly. The other side of the picture is that I presuppose a certain familiarity with political theory. In particular, I rework some ideas from Hobbes and Hume in terms of game theory without pausing to explain the broader context within which these ideas occur in Leviathan and the Treatise.’ 
It is important (again) to remind readers that this is not a finished book and Brian would certainly not have published it in its current form. However, it is a book that he wanted to be useful particularly, but not only, to students and it is added to this site in that spirit.
Here you can download:
Part 1 and Part 2 of Brian’s draft book on game theory and Brian’s handwritten figures.

another book to be added

Papers

Brian writes at the beginning of this piece, “My object in this paper is to define ‘ethnic politics’, to show how ethnic politics is related to other kinds of politics, and to ask whether, as has been suggested by some authors, the experience of several small Western European states in reconciling non-ethnic communal divisions within a basically non-coercive democratic framework has applicability to situations of ethnically-based divisions.”
This long, incomplete, article – in two parts – is in large part concerned with Peter M. Blau’s book, Exchange and Power in Social Life (New York, 1964), but it also shows Brian’s working through issues of voting behaviour, which was a significant concern of his at the time.
Download Exchange, Power and Politics (Part 1) and Exchange, Power and Politics (Part 2).
This paper was clearly prepared for a reading group or seminar series as reference is made to what will be discussed by someone else at the “next meeting”. The paper concerns Hubert Blalock’s ideas in Towards a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. That book was published in 1967, and it would be surprising if this paper dated from much after that. 
 
In the same file was another document – an Addendum.
 

This piece, dated 1966, aims to put in game form some of the strategic problems of British party politics of the time.

This undated piece discusses, Brian writes, “the political conditions under which policies having inlets of certain kinds are liable to be put into effect; the organizational and
other pre-requisites for putting into effect policies of certain kinds; and so on.” He continues, “That these are important questions to which a lot of people have addressed themselves in the past couple of millennia does not of course guarantee that there are satisfactory answers, nor can I claim here to do more than nibble at a few edges.”

Download Public Policy and Political Theory.
This long paper (delivered in France) takes off from Dahl and Tufte, Size and Democracy (a book Brian also reviewed in Government and Opposition).
 
 
A French summary was also produced (we assume by someone else).
A discussion (in part) of Rawls on the claims of future generations.
 

Miscellaneous

This handwritten piece is for a talk at the University of Lancaster. The page numbering is odd (it goes from page 13 to page 101), but the talk seems to follow so presumably it was a matter of combining a new introduction with existing material. On two pages (200 and 203) figures are given on the reverse side, so these are copied separately.
 
 
Download reverse of page 200 and of page 203
This piece was prepared for a seminar and comes in a clean version and an annotated version of some of the pages with additional notes on “Axelrod” (the latter presumably being the version Brian had with him when he participated in the seminar).
 
Download clean version of Comments on Power in Non-Voting Groups.
 
This handwritten piece is the job talk Brian gave at the University of Manchester.
 
Download Manchester Job Talk (the file is very large as it is a pdf of handwritten script).
As the title suggests, this is a conference talk given in New York in 1971.
 
This lecture was given by Brian when he was Hinkley Visiting Professor at The Johns Hopkins University.
 
It begins with a discussion of the idea of “Oriental Despotism” in the history of political thought and goes on: “It is simply not true that the natural tendency of states is to concentrate power in the hands of a single man or a single cohesive set of men, standing off from society and operating upon it by coercive force. On the contrary, the natural tendency of states is towards the diffusion and fragmentation of political power, and towards the absorption of political power into the social and economic groupings of which the society is composed. The creation of active, independent political power requires continuous attention and effort. It can be achieved, with difficulty, either through coercion or consent. Clearly the latter is preferable, and is what we hope our western democratic societies will maintain. But I think that our fear of despotism is counter productive to the point where a continuation of present trends could really lead to a change towards despotism.” 
 

Correspondence

Letters to be added.

Teaching Materials

Lecture notes to be added.

Links

Links to be added.